Link

Chapters: 20/?
Fandom: Sherlock (TV), Sherlock Holmes & Related Fandoms
Rating: Explicit
Warnings: Author Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings, Graphic Depictions Of Violence
Relationships: Sherlock Holmes & John Watson, Sherlock Holmes/John Watson
Characters: Sherlock Holmes, John Watson, Mycroft Holmes, Greg Lestrade, OCs
Additional Tags: AU - futurelock, augmented!John, Discrimination, not too distant future, body dysmorphia of a sort, self-care, TW: amputation, graphic depictions of gore, episode remixing, The Great Game, rated for eventual graphic sex and violence, eventual slash, preslash, Developing Relationship, Slow Burn, Slow Build, Body Modification, scifi violence and gore, Worldbuilding
Series: Part 2 of STATIC
Summary:

John wants to explain the rush of sensation and data, which is just another form of sensation (or is it the other way around?). John wants to say:

Augmentation circuits report temperature, pressure, various forms of quantitative input. Sudden changes are reported as pain, since sudden changes are dangerous, and pain is the quickest way to encourage reflexive extraction.

But all John can manage is, “Nng.”

Because this sudden touch is not reporting as pain.

Chapter 20 is up!

Photoset
Photoset

funnyordie:

6 GIFs of Miguel’s Epic Stage Dive

Miguel tried to fly during Sunday’s Billboard Music Awards. He didn’t quite make it, but he did manage to crush a couple of women’s heads and inspire these amazing GIFs!

(via kore85)

Text

imagine-dragonlords:

thewayweride:

If you’re lesbian and you fall for a guy
FINE
If you’re gay and you fall for a woman
FINE
If you’re bisexual and you have a preference for girls
FINE
If you’re bisexual and you have a preference for guys
FINE
If you’re pansexual and have a preference
FINE
What’s not fine is telling someone they can’t love another person because it doesn’t fit into the confinements of a label. 

T H I S

If you’re asexual and get attracted to someone somehow. 

FINE. 

(Source: 50shadesofacceptance, via thekoontzy)

Photo
….Appropriate.

….Appropriate.

Photoset

thekoontzy:

thekoontzy:

Hey guys! I just recently hit a hundred followers wooO! So I am doing a small give away. I have three sets of dog tags.  Two are Sebastian Moran and one is John Watson. So here are the rules:

  1. Unlike Most give-aways there are two winners! First place gets the John Watson dog tags plus a set of Sebastian Moran dog tags. Second place just gets a set of Sebastian Moran dog tags.
  2. If you were one of my first hundred followers you get entered twice when you reblog this. (My lil gift to my first hundred)
  3. Reblogs are the only thing that counts (no likes) and I will only count the first reblog.
  4. You must have your message box open. If I cannot contact you then I will pick another person.
  5. No give-away blogs! This is unfair to your other fellow tumblr folk. I will try to check before giving out these so please just be honest dearies. <3
  6. You don’t have to follow me to win!
  7. You don’t have to live in the states to win!
  8. This ends on May 25th!

ONLY A FEW DAYS LEFT GUYS!!!

(via withoutalittlerisk)

Photoset

devynjaiden:

qbutch:

missmatie:

peanuhbutta:

This is realllllllllly weird lmao

This is really NORMAL.
Except we never see it-so it is terrifying and uncomfortable when it happens.
(Mostly because people would laugh or be unkind)

I own a sex shop. Once a woman bled on our chair during an interview. She was horrified and felt ashamed because it was in some way unprofessional. We weren’t bothered. We said ‘what better place to work on being ok with your body than at a feminist sex shop?’
Bleeding is normal and dealing with it is one of the most pervasive ways women are complicit in their silence.

Some men bleed too. How would you react to that? For many men who are Trans the act of bleeding is a security threat.

Fuck off with your lolz.

Reblogging again for above commentary ^^^^^

So happy that the above commentor included trans* men. 

(Source: cycleofmisery, via bonesthatrattle)

Text

I want to talk about the shit that’s fucked me up on the inside, but I also don’t want people to know about it and include it as a factor in their observation of and interaction with me.

Text

urksies:

cosmopanther:

I think the real question is why should a girl shave, preen and diet herself into oblivion for a guy in sweatpants and a t shirt who hasn’t trimmed his pubes in 3 years

PREACH

(Source: kawaiicornsnake, via dumbledorathexplora)

Link

prettyarbitrary:

costumecommunityservice:

eschergirls:

“‘We Have Always Fought’: Challenging the ‘Women, Cattle and Slaves’ Narrative” by Kameron Hurley — A Dribble of Ink

I often tell people that I’m the biggest self-aware misogynist I know.

I was writing a scene last night between a woman general and the man she helped put on the throne. I started writing in some romantic tension, and realized how lazy that was. There are other kinds of tension.

I made a passing reference to sexual slavery, which I had to cut.  I nearly had him use a gendered slur against her. I growled at the screen. He wanted to help save her child… no. Her brother? Ok.  She was going to betray him. OK. He had some wives who died… ug. No. Close advisors? Friends? Maybe somebody  just… left him?

Even writing about societies where there is very little sexual violence, or no sexual violence against women, I find myself writing in the same tired tropes and motivations. “Well, this is a bad guy, and I need something traumatic to happen to this heroine, so I’ll have him rape her.” That was an actual thing I did in the first draft of my first book, which features a violent society where women outnumber men 25-1.  Because, of course, it’s What You Do.

I actually watched a TV show recently that was supposedly about this traumatic experience a young girl went through, but was, in fact, simply tossed in so that the two male characters in the show could fight over it, and argue about which of them was at fault because of what happened to her. It was the most flagrant erasure of a female character and her experiences that I’d seen in some time. She’s literally in the room with them while they fight about it, revealing all these character things about them while she sort of fades into the background.

We forget what the story’s about. We erase women in our stories who, in our own lives, are powerful, forthright, intelligent, terrifying people. Women stab and maim and kill and lead and manage and own and run. We know that. We experience it every day. We see it.

But this is our narrative: two men fighting loudly in a room, and a woman snuffling in a corner.

This is a really interesting article about the way media, fiction and narratives repeated in society shape the way we see and assume reality to be, specifically (in this case) about how narratives about women being victims, or supporting men, but not being fighters or soldiers create the idea that women never did that, and it’s only a modern new thing that we think they could, when in fact that’s not true at all.

Also, specifically relevant to this blog are the parts about how that affects us when we create stories ourselves, and can end up adding to this narrative consciously and subconsciously.  It’s the same with how women are depicted in illustrated fiction.  I honestly don’t think a lot of the boobs and butt poses, or women in bikini armor, are drawn by people consciously thinking sexist thoughts, I think they’re just doing What You Do.  This is a female character, this is just the pose we’re used to seeing women in.  We don’t think twice about drawing her like that, because it’s just how we’ve become conditioned to seeing women pose in the medium.  Same with stuff like this.  It’s how we’re used to seeing female armor, and when we think “female warrior”, our imagination just instinctively runs in the direction of what we’re used to seeing.  It’s just What You Do with female armor, and female characters, and female poses.

Since starting Escher Girls, I’ve gotten quite a lot of mail from people telling me that they never realized just how often they put their female characters in boobs and butt poses, or gave them bikini armor, just because that’s how they saw women drawn in video games and comics and never thought twice about it.  It’s just what seemed “right” to them, and that they’re now a lot more conscious of it and try to have more variety in the way they depict women, and often in ways that make more sense to the story. :)

I think it’s just important to catch ourselves sometimes and think are we creating something because this fits what we’re doing, and this makes sense, or are we just doing What You Do?  (This applies to all sorts of tropes and stereotypes too.)

Ah good. I was going to post this article but someone got there first, with commentary! Thanks. :)

Not a strictly costume design related read, but definitely an exploration of factors that might contribute to some of our least favorite costume designs for female characters.

Thoughtful stuff!

Photoset

ikenbot:

The 4th dimension in our case is where the 3D structures including this very Universe combine and exist within changing time frames. 4D structure can’t exist within a 3D one but a 3D structure can exist in a 4D just like your drawings exist within that flat paper as lines and points but couldn’t exist in our 3D world by itself. Extra dimensions work the same, like a Matryoshka doll that loses and or gains properties the further you go.

Image: 3D projection of a tesseract undergoing a simple rotation in four dimensional space.

In mathematical physics, Minkowski space or Minkowski spacetime (named after the mathematician Hermann Minkowski) is the mathematical space setting in which Einstein’s theory of special relativity is most conveniently formulated. In this setting the three ordinary dimensions of space are combined with a single dimension of time to form a four-dimensional manifold for representing a spacetime. [**]

In physics, spacetime (also space–time, space time or space–time continuum) is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single continuum. Spacetime is usually interpreted with space as existing in three dimensions and time playing the role of a fourth dimension that is of a different sort from the spatial dimensions. From a Euclidean space perspective, the universe has three dimensions of space and one of time. By combining space and time into a single manifold, physicists have significantly simplified a large number of physical theories, as well as described in a more uniform way the workings of the universe at both the supergalactic and subatomic levels. [**]

But my favorite explanation of extra dimensions in general is Carl Sagan’s version. His version was based on Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions which is an 1884 satirical short story by Edwin Abbott Abbott:

The story is about a two-dimensional world referred to as Flatland which is occupied by geometric figures. Women are simple line-segments, while men are polygons with various numbers of sides. The narrator is a humble square, a member of the social caste of gentlemen and professionals in a society of geometric figures, who guides us through some of the implications of life in two dimensions. The Square has a dream about a visit to a one-dimensional world (Lineland) which is inhabited by “lustrous points”.

He attempts to convince the realm’s ignorant monarch of a second dimension but finds that it is essentially impossible to make him see outside of his eternally straight line.

He is then visited by a three-dimensional sphere, which he cannot comprehend until he sees Spaceland for himself. This Sphere (who remains nameless, like all characters in the novella) visits Flatland at the turn of each millennium to introduce a new apostle to the idea of a third dimension in the hopes of eventually educating the population of Flatland of the existence of Spaceland. From the safety of Spaceland, they are able to observe the leaders of Flatland secretly acknowledging the existence of the sphere and prescribing the silencing of anyone found preaching the truth of Spaceland and the third dimension. After this proclamation is made, many witnesses are massacred or imprisoned (according to caste).

After the Square’s mind is opened to new dimensions, he tries to convince the Sphere of the theoretical possibility of the existence of a fourth (and fifth, and sixth …) spatial dimension.

The depiction above is a 4 dimensional figure as represented by 3 dimensional cubes within cubes to visualize how 4th dimensions may work.

Related: Carl Sagan explains extra dimensions

(via miandkasios)

Text

crockercorp:

does anyone else have this other self they’ve created in their mind that is not really exactly you irl but is more like what you want to be and has a life that continues in your head with like weird continuing daydreams but they’re not perfect or anything and wow i forget where i was going with this

(Source: chorui, via drunktaire)

Photoset

arttickles:

Strong Vitals by viaframe for Corbis

(via Corbis - Creative Imaging)

reblogging for reasons…

(via eugenicswars)

Photoset

darklock:

We’ve reached 221 followers! The three of us are incredibly happy about this, and we’d like to thank you all for being so awesome. There are many people who enjoy these kinds of fanfic/fanart but not that many blogs about them, and we’re more than happy to provide a little dark haven for all your twisted needs. So, to celebrate your awesomeness, here is our first Darklock giveaway.

- - -

HERE’S WHAT YOU CAN TAKE HOME

  • A 1,000 to 3,000 words long fanfiction written by our very own Ago (see below)
  • A cross-stitched red pants piece, hand crafted by Nikki. (see it HERE)
  • Our eternal love*

* Subject to availability

- - -

AND NOW, A FEW WORDS FROM OUR SPONSOR

Hey guys! I’m Ago, also known as fauxvol. I’ll be the one writing the fanfic for the winner.

Since this is for darklock, I’ll only be accepting dark-themed prompts. If you have no idea what that means, check our tags for common topics. If you have a prompt you’re not sure is dark or not, send us an ask and we’ll let you know!

I’ll be writing around 1k-3k words. You can go to my AO3 to check my past works for reference, or send me a message and I’ll show you my (darker) WIPs. I accept all kinds of prompts, from one-liners to pictures to whatever you want to give me, but I’d rather work on the winner’s story alongside them so I can make sure they like the final result.

I will not write: incest, watersports, humiliation play or Sherlock/anyone who’s not John or Jim. If you have any questions, Darklock’s ask is always open!

[Ago’s tumblr] [Ago’s profile on AO3]

- - -

RULES

  • Reblog to get a chance to participate. Multiple reblogs mean multiple chances, if/as long as each reblog appears on the notes. I don’t really know how it works. Basically, we’re not going to scout every blog to see how many times they reblogged this, but we’re not erasing your name if it appears more than once. Likes do not count.
  • Followers only. Yes, we will check. Yes, it still counts if you started following us after the giveaway started. It’s an event for our followers, so pretty basic rules.
  • Ask box must be open. At least at the time the giveaway ends. If we contact you and we don’t hear back from you after 48 hours, we’ll pick another winner.
  • Giveaway ends on JUNE 1ST, 23:59 GMT

(via ivorylungs)

Text

It’s decided: if you can get a natural high, a contact high, adrenaline high, etc….

Compliment high.